Board Thread:Event Discussion/@comment-70.166.177.77-20131207054710/@comment-24167698-20131210095628

In OP's defense, I think it's pretty clear that his/her initial assumption was that Zynga does not, in fact, tamper with rates. The statement 'Zynga could easily make those two slightly less likely than the other 55 cards' was, in fact, in direct opposition to the original sentiment and could have only been taken as a disclaimer, since apparently OP did not subscribe to this notion at any point. It's also pretty factual, since Z does indeed have administrative access to their servers, and could in theory abuse it, but nowhere did the OP state that they did it in practice.

Just my two cents, it was an entertaining read.