Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24148225-20131109112629/@comment-14298960-20131109184348

You sound a lot like one of my pastors back when I was in grade school/high school, lol.

I understand what you're saying in a sense but your first argument pretty much said it all, it's just a game, and in this case a wholly unbalanced game where the concept of fairplay was thrown out in favour of the concept of vertical capitalism.

Frankly, this is one game where the creators (Zynga) decided they didn't give one toss about balance. It is not those that abuse level 1 that are powerful, it is those who are willing to spend their paychecks, their parent's pay check and their granparent's pention.

The idea of stealing is, societally unacceptable but in this scenario would be more akin to proof of strength, that said the existence of charms disables any context of strength. A level 1 player could slap a charm on a coveted stone and he could "win" against someone who is level 300.

While I applaud your good intentions, I believe that they are ultimately pointless, those people who run Zynga need to be completely replaced first before there is any hope of "good direction" or "fair play".

That is not to say I do not enjoy the game, I do in fact enjoy it. That said I do not play this game for any percieved notion of a "good game" I play because I love the card art, and the story line is interesting. Beyond that I'd rather go play Steel Commanders (which I am), I'm not going to advertise another game in AGG's forums like those DMT fanatics (s*** game btw, imo) but if the two were to be compared in gameplay, and gameplay, alone the superiority of the design should be obvious.

TL;DR: Yeah, if you can't be bothered, then you can't be bothered, cheers!