Talk:"Arcanum Bellum: The Lovers"/@comment-25096609-20150205150015

I couldn't care less if you don't like Lovers (Pure).

But I'm tired of the self concluded ideas or what I call them BS that you've been throwing on it without any real background or definition.

for example:

[ LOVERS, IT'S PLURAL IT HAS TO BE TWO ENTITIES IN IT LIKE IN REVERSED! ]

No, sorry. The Lovers is a minstranslation of our modern time by the confusion of some tarot card illustration, in ancient decks of tarot "The Lovers" card is called solely as "Love" or "The Amorous one", so there you go It's not a representation of two lovers.

Besides that, in most illustration of the tarot card there are more than two lovers (also those two are Adam and Eve in Waite) there is also an Angel that could be either Cupid or Raphael

More than that in other illustrations there is a man who has to choose one of two women.

[ THE LOVERS SHOULD REPRESENT ROMANCE, LOVE NOT A NAKED WOMAN ]

No, it is common that people confuses the meaning or what the card represents, The Lovers card does not represent romantic love, it represents love yes but it represents affection to anything you feel like you are tied to for example a new pair of shoes you can't live without or a puppy you need in your life or basicly your soul mate or your twin (not necessarly a romantic interest could be a friend)

And if you look at the majority of tarot card illustration of The Lovers it has no fire or water.

What does it have to do?

Well fire represents burning passion and water represents romantic emotions.

It does have Air, it is about communication, harmony, it's about the psyche.

[ IT'S ALMOST VALENTINES DAY, SO IT SHOULD REPRESENT LOVE! ]

No, first of all the event ends before Valentines day even starts.

Besides, Valentines day is not only for your lover, It's for anyone you love, your family, friends...etc.

[ SHE'S NAKED SHE'S A PROSTITUTE EW! FANSERVICE! ]

Please, don't make me laugh, so just because she is naked you find it erotic? lewd?

Make some sense in your mind, do you find that Olympia by Manet erotic to you? or even better Venus by Botticelli or Urbino.

It's not the first time we see naked women in art do we? then think again.

No, she's not a prostitute, I don't see her selling her body.

Naked women are representation of female deities or muses, they painted them to represent the divine.

Fanservice? Maybe but then, why are you mad? It's not like it's something rare.

So you go correct me why do you find her disgusting, because she's naked? Or is it because you feel like it's not acceptable by the "Age Restriction" come on It's just art, kids see naked women on magazines many times, should I point out Kim Kardashians Break the Internet photo?

[ SHE'S A REDUCER ]

If you don't need another one cool, but when you find yourself in frustration because you can't beat *Insert Anima SWG here* don't you dare rant.

And there it is my 2cents on your rants and rages, so go do your research the next time.